Vrs Vs Vri

f and hard-of-hearing individuals skilled in American Signservices - not by the government. Depending on the
Language (ASL), Video Relay Services (VRS) andsituation, a qualified interpreter may be required as a
Video Remote Interpreting (VRI) both provide valuablereasonable accommodation under the Americans with
resources to remove obstacles when communicatingDisabilities Act (ADA), especially in hospital and
with the hearing world.courthouse situations.
Video Relay Services is a form ofVRI is not limited by geography. You can take
Telecommunications Relay Services (TRS) which:advantage of VRI from any place in the world with a
1. allows those with hearing disabilities access to thewebcam and high speed Internet connection. VRI is
telephone systemnow the first choice for courtrooms where the need
2. allows the deaf to use American Sign Languagefor an ASL interpreter cannot always be scheduled in
instead of a text telephone (TTY) to call a hearingadvance.
party over normal telephone linesIn-person sign language interpreters usually:
3. permits the use of a high speed Internet connection* require booking in advance (24 hours)
plus a web cam or video conferencing equipment to* require a two-hour minimum fee, no matter how
access a Communications Assistant (CA) in a callshort the actual interpreting needs
center* charge a 2 hour minimum fee if the job is not
4. the CA signs to the deaf person and speaks to thecanceled 24 hours in advance
hearing one*charge the minimum if the deaf client is absent
5. also allows a hearing person to initiate a call to theVRI can:
deaf individual1. substitute for in-person interpreters when not
Costs for VRS calls are covered by the Interstateavailable
TRS Fund which is managed by the FCC. Calls are2. reduce the cost to private medical offices and
free to both parties and are “relayed” by the CA,universities who are required to provide sign language
who is a skilled, qualified ASL interpreter.interpreters but who are not reimbursed by the
The FCC mandates that VRS is only to be used in agovernment
situation where the deaf individual would have made a3. provide interpreting in hazardous situations such as
typical voice call through the telephone system were itprisons and medical facilities
not for the disability. VRS may not be used as a4. available 24/7 when needed
replacement for a live interpreter.5. no additional charges for last minute booking or
VRI serves a different need. With VRI, both the deafcancellations
and hearing individuals are situated in the same place,6. get rid of “in-person” interpreter charges for
such as a hospital, school, college classroom,travel and parking
courtroom, police station, prison, or any other locationImproper use of VRS to substitute illegally for VRI is an
where an in-person sign language interpreter is notongoing concern of the FCC. While VRS service
available.providers have software in place to identify abusive
Fees are paid for by the party requesting VRIcalls, no system is perfect.